Failure Analaysis

   Failure as a Design      Criterion

   Fracture Mechanics

 :: 

Tutorial Questions

 :: 

Griffith Equation


 :: 


Stress Intensity Factor and Fracture Toughness Testing
- Stresses Close to a Crack Tip
- Fracture of Glass
- High Strength Versus high Toughness
- Quenching and Residual Stress
- Missile Motor Case Fracture
- Fracture Toughness Tests
- Plastic Zone Effect
- Specimen Thickness Effect
- Growth of Semi-Elliptic Flaws
- Leak-Before-Break Concept
- Pressurised Vessels
- Fracture of a Beer Barrel
- Pin-Loaded Lug
- Materials Selection and Temperature
- Chemical Reactor Vessel
- Fracture of Ice


 :: 

Characterising Sub-Critical Growth
 -  Fatigue Life Prediction
 -  Stress Corrosion Cracking

 :: 

Theory Resource



Problem 1

This question is designed to illustrate the difference between the accurate solution for crack tip stresses, and the approximate solution (using only the first term in the expression, which contains the singularity) on which the stress intensity factor, K, is based. It should take about 15 minutes to complete.

For a through-thickness crack in an infinite plate, the tensile stress distribution ahead of the crack tip is accurately described by the equation:
where x is distance along the crack from its centre-line, as shown in the diagram. Q2.1Pic1.jpg (19122 bytes)
In terms of the stress intensity factor, the stress very near to the crack tip can be approximated as:

where r is distance ahead of the crack tip.
What is the difference between the stress predictions of these two equations at a distance r = 0.02a ahead of the crack tip?

Scientific Calculator | RPN Calculator | Graph Plot | Theory

Hint | Solution

TOP

Failure Analysis  -  Fracture Mechanics  -  Failure As A Design Criterion